Legal Opinion

Tidey v. Riverside Foundry & Galvanizing Co.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided December 12, 1967No. Docket 1,750PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFitzgerald, P. J.

This dispute involves ■ the question of the right of the wife of defendant’s employee, Chester O. Tidey, who suffered two distinct but concurrent disabilities in the course of his employment, and subsequently died, to collect the maximum death benefit under the workmen’s compensation law.

Chester Tidey, plaintiff’s deceased husband, worked as a molder in defendant’s foundry from 1942 until December 19, 1948. On December 14, 1948, he sustained a hack injury determined by a workmen’s compensation hearing referee to have resulted in total and permanent disability for which *45he was initially…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hebert v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Stewart v. Lakey Foundry & MacHine Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Curtis v. Slater Construction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Wolanin v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1943

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Welch v. Westran Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Hairston v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Benavides v. Edward C. Levy Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Tidey v. Riverside Foundry & Galvanizing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Thumser v. Lakey Foundry Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API