Legal Opinion

Thumser v. Lakey Foundry Corp.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 20, 1978No. Docket 77-3256PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJ. H. Gillis, J.

The facts in this matter are not in dispute. Plaintiff was intermittently employed by defendant Lakey Foundry Corporation (hereinafter referred to as Lakey) between 1942 and 1971 as a skilled millwright.

In 1971, Lakey was suffering financial difficulties and was forced to terminate plaintiff’s position. Some months later, on June 26, 1972; plaintiff filed a petition for workmen’s compensation benefits for an alleged disability arising out of his employment with Lakey.

During the pendency of these proceedings, plaintiff secured an unskilled position with defendant, McGuire’s Auto Parts…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hebert v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Derwinski v. Eureka Tire Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Tidey v. Riverside Foundry & Galvanizing Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1967

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hughes v. Lakey Foundry Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Hairston v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Bauer v. Allied Supermarkets, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API