Legal Opinion

Curtis v. Slater Construction Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1918No. Docket No. 36PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Certiorari to Industrial Accident Board. Maria Curtis presented her claim for compensation against the Slater Construction Company for the accidental death of her husband in defendant’s employ. From an order awarding compensation, defendant brings certiorari.

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.

On November 20, 1913, John N. Curtis, husband of plaintiff, sustained an accidental injury while in defendant’s employ by which he was incapacitated for the work in which he was engaged until December 10, 1913, when he returned and continued in defendant’s service until some time in January, 1914, quitting, as defendant claimed, because most of its employees were laid off at that time owing to weather conditions and there was no further work for him to do. How steadily he worked after returning is a matter in dispute. When he returned to work on December 10, 1913, an agreement was entered…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cooke v. Holland Furnace Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Kalucki v. American Car & Foundry Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Podkastelnea v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Redfield v. Michigan Workmen's Compensation Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Dane v. Michigan United Traction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Beels v. Department of Labor and IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Pardeick v. Iron City Engineering Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Laird v. State of Vermont Highway Dept.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1941
  4. Wolanin v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Purdy & Whitfield v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1942

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API