Legal Opinion

People v. Velasquez

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 23, 1924No. Docket No. 1157PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

Defendant was charged with having under his control and in his possession a firearm capable of being concealed upon his person, he being then and there a foreign-born person and not a citizen of the United States. He was found guilty as charged.

The only question involved in this appeal is whether there was any legal evidence produced at the trial tending to prove that the defendant, at the time of the conviction of the offense charged, was an unnaturalized, foreign-born person. In support of the allegation of the information, charging that defendant was a foreign-born person and not a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. RatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Thompson v. SprayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  3. People v. T. Wah HingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  4. Prentice v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Bode v. TrimmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. OsakiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  2. People v. QuarezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Bancroft v. BancroftCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. Thomas v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  5. People v. HuntleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API