Legal Opinion

Sneed v. Barna

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 2, 1996No. 17889-3-IIPublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBridgewater, J.

This case requires us to decide whether a reassignment from elementary school principal to Administrator for At-Risk Students constituted an "adverse action.” We hold that the assignment, which maintained Emma Sneed at her current salary, was not an adverse change in her contract status pursuant to stat*845ute, and that the facts surrounding her new position do not support a constructive discharge claim as a matter of law. We affirm.

Sneed appeals a summary judgment dismissing her suit that challenged her transfer from principal to the Administrator for At-Risk Students in the Tacoma Public School…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bowles v. Department of Retirement SystemsWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Streater v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
  3. Janiece S. NOLAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Joseph Maxwell CLELAND, Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  4. Bulaich v. AT&T INFORMATION SYSTEMSWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Micone v. Town of Steilacoom Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Washington v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  2. Haubry v. SnowCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  3. Haubry v. SnowCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  4. Washington v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  5. Robert Roybal v. Toppenish School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API