Legal Opinion
Robert Roybal v. Toppenish School District
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 20, 2017No. 15-35541PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HAWKINS, Circuit Judge:
In this interlocutory appeal, the Toppenish School District (“the District”) and its Superintendent, John Cerna (“Cerna”) (collectively, “Toppenish”), appeal the denial of qualified immunity and adverse summary judgment grant in Robert Roy-bal’s (“Roybal”) 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Roybal, a former principal in the District, claims the District reduced his salary without due process and retaliated against him for speaking to an attorney about his performance evaluation. The district court denied Cerna qualified immunity, determining Toppenish violated due process…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Johnson v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- fhlmc/freddie Mac v. Sfr Investments Pool 1, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Tasha Williamson v. City of National CityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- Patrick Russell v. Jocelyn LumitapCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- Preston Seidner v. Jonathan De VriesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- Jerome McKinney v. University of PittsburghCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.