Legal Opinion
Overton Power District No. 5 v. Watkins
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided July 28, 1993No. CV-S-92-860-PMP (RLH)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER
PRO, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs Overton Power District No. 5 and Valley Electric Association, Inc. (referred to collectively as “Plaintiffs” or “Over-ton/Valley”), are resale power customers of the Colorado River Commission. On October 15, 1992, Overton/Valley brought this action under the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 551, et seq., and the Boulder Canyon Project Act, 43 U.S.C. § 617, et seq., for review of a final Order of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”), which confirmed a rate charged for power produced at Hoover Dam by…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Overton Power District No. 5 v. O'LearyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Util. L. Rep. P 14,081, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 129, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 201 Overton Power District No. 5, Valley Electric Association, Inc. v. Hazel R. O'leary, William H. White, Christine Ervin, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Arizona Power Authority, Defendant-Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996