Legal Opinion

Overton Power District No. 5 v. O'Leary

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 4, 1996No. 93-17233PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judge:

Overton Power District No. 5 and Valley Electric Association (collectively “Over-ton/Valley”), two Nevada power suppliers, challenge the rate charged for power generated at Hoover Dam. The district court granted summary judgment rejecting most of Overton/V alley’s claims. Overton Power Dist No. 5 v. Watkins, 829 F.Supp. 1523 (D.Nev.1993). Because we conclude Over-ton/Valley lack standing, we remand with an order for the district court to vacate its opinion and dismiss Overton/Valley’s action.

FACTS

The Western Area Power Administration (Western) sets power rates…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Clarke v. Securities Industry Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Block v. Community Nutrition InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. National Wildlife Federation v. BurfordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  5. Overton Power District No. 5 v. WatkinsDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1993

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Util. L. Rep. P 14,081, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 129, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 201 Overton Power District No. 5, Valley Electric Association, Inc. v. Hazel R. O'leary, William H. White, Christine Ervin, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Arizona Power Authority, Defendant-Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API