Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Hermes Associates, Ltd.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 2005No. 20040729PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILKINS, Associate Chief Justice:

T1 Appellants seek review of the district court's holdings in this real property dispute, alleging that the district court erred when it (1) granted Plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment; (2) awarded mandatory in-junctive relief, which imposed specific metes and bounds requirements on Hermes; and (8) declined to balance the equities in granting the motion for partial summary judgment. We affirm the district court on all three of its holdings.

BACKGROUND

I. RELEVANT FACTS

I 2 When reviewing a rule 56(c) motion for summary judgment, we recite the facts in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Thurston v. Box Elder CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Papanikolas Bros. Enterprises v. Sugarhouse Shopping Center AssociatesUtah Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Lovendahl v. Jordan School DistrictUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Carrier v. LindquistUtah Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Utah County v. BaxterUtah Supreme Court · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. MacK v. Utah State Department of CommerceUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. HorneUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  3. M.J. v. WisanUtah Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Helf v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Poteet v. WhiteUtah Supreme Court · 2006

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API