Johnson v. Hermes Associates, Ltd.
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WILKINS, Associate Chief Justice:
T1 Appellants seek review of the district court's holdings in this real property dispute, alleging that the district court erred when it (1) granted Plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment; (2) awarded mandatory in-junctive relief, which imposed specific metes and bounds requirements on Hermes; and (8) declined to balance the equities in granting the motion for partial summary judgment. We affirm the district court on all three of its holdings.
BACKGROUND
I. RELEVANT FACTS
I 2 When reviewing a rule 56(c) motion for summary judgment, we recite the facts in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Thurston v. Box Elder CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1995
- Papanikolas Bros. Enterprises v. Sugarhouse Shopping Center AssociatesUtah Supreme Court · 1975
- Lovendahl v. Jordan School DistrictUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- Carrier v. LindquistUtah Supreme Court · 2001
- Utah County v. BaxterUtah Supreme Court · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- MacK v. Utah State Department of CommerceUtah Supreme Court · 2009
- Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. HorneUtah Supreme Court · 2012
- M.J. v. WisanUtah Supreme Court · 2016
- Helf v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2015
- Poteet v. WhiteUtah Supreme Court · 2006
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.