Legal Opinion

Optimax, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 17, 2002PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Senior Judge MIRARCHI, Jr.

Optimax, Inc. (Employer) appeals from an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) that affirmed the decision of the workers’ compensation Judge (WCJ) denying its application for reimbursement of overpaid workers’ compensation benefits from the Supersedeas Fund. We vacate and remand.

The record reveals the following relevant facts. Katherine Yacono (Claimant) sustained an injury on November 13, 1990 in the course of her employment with Employer and began receiving workers’ compensation benefits pursuant to a notice of compensation payable.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Russell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Commonwealth, Bureau of Worker's Compensation v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Commonwealth v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Bureau of Workers' Compensation v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Gallagher Bassett Services v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth, Department of Labor & Industry, Bureau of Workers' Compensation v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Pep Boys, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API