Legal Opinion

Bolstad v. Paul Bunyan Oil Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 30, 1943No. 33,562PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing the action without prejudice after denial of defendant Van Loon’s motion for judgment notwithstanding disagreement of the jury.

Plaintiff sued to recover for personal injuries. The jury disagreed and was discharged. Defendant Yan Loon then moved under Minn. St. 1941, § 605.06 (Mason St. 1927, § 9495), for judgment notwithstanding the disagreement of the jury. Prior to hearing of the motion plaintiff entered a voluntary dismissal, of which he gave due notice to defendants. Defendant Van Loon objected to the dismissal. After denial…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Phelps v. Winona & St. Peter RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  2. Muellenberg v. JoblinskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  3. Baird v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific R'y Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1883
  4. Jurries v. VirgensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  5. Floody v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Storey v. WeinbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  2. State v. BraathenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Minnwest Bank Central v. Flagship Properties LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
  4. Beatty v. Winona Housing & Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  5. Helton Const. Co., Inc. v. ThriftMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API