Jurries v. Virgens
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Martin county to restrain defendants from deepening, widening or extending a certain ditch and from main-taming that ditch. The case was tried before Quinn, J., who ordered - judgment in favor of defendants. From an order overruling plaintiff’s alternative motion that the conclusions of law be-amended or for a new trial, plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.
Appellant was the owner of the southeast *4 of section 8, township 103, range 31, Martin county,» and commenced this action to restrain respondents, owners of certain land in sections 17 and 20 in the same township, from constructing and maintaining a certain ditch, and from causing the same to discharge water upon appellant’s premises. Respondents answered, and justified their action as contractors under an order of the county commissioners, which established a public ditch over the locality, pursuant to a petition for that purpose. - The trial court found that the petition for the ditch was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Johnson v. Town of ClontarfSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Bilsborrow v. PierceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Lager v. County of SibleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Gile v. StegnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
- Miller v. JensenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- State ex rel. Pederson v. WattsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
- Slingerland v. ConnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
- Bolstad v. Paul Bunyan Oil Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Rooney v. County of StearnsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.