Legal Opinion

City of Caldwell v. Roark

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1978No. 12383PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAKES, Justice.

Roy and Oleta Roark brought an action against the City of Caldwell to establish their interest in land that was formerly the subject of condemnation proceedings instituted by the city. The Roarks also moved to amend the judgment entered in the condemnation action. The trial court granted summary judgment to the city and denied the Roarks’ motion to amend. The Roarks appeal from both rulings. We affirm.

I

In 1965 the city brought an action to condemn certain land owned by the Roarks. The city alleged that the land was “necessary for the enlargement, improvement and maintenance of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fox-Smythe Transportation Company v. McCartneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
  2. Tingwall v. King Hill Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Reidy v. O'Malley Lumber CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  4. City of Caldwell v. RoarkIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Saydes v. CuoioIdaho Supreme Court · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. South Fork Coalition v. Board of CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Dermody v. City of RenoNevada Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Jonathan v. NallySupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
  4. Erickson v. AmothIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  5. South Fork Coalition v. Board of CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API