Legal Opinion
Dermody v. City of Reno
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided January 30, 1997No. 27164PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Prior to 1978, appellants John A. and Martha Sue Dermody, husband and wife, and E.W. and Genevieve McKenzie, husband and wife, (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Appellants”) owned 126.727 acres of land bordering what is commonly known as Reno-Tahoe International Airport. Appurtenant to this parcel of land were water rights consisting of a portion of Truckee River Claim No. 524 of the Orr Ditch Decree in the amount of approximately 229.25 acre-feet of water. The respondent City of Reno (hereinafter “City”) prohibited development on Appellants’ property in anticipation of airport…
3Cases cited17 opinions
- Bulbman, Inc. v. Nevada BellNevada Supreme Court · 1992
- S. A. Empresa De Viacao Aerea Rio Grandense (Varig Airlines) v. Walter Kidde & Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Butler v. BogdanovichNevada Supreme Court · 1985
- University of Nevada v. TarkanianNevada Supreme Court · 1994
- Hoopes v. HammargrenNevada Supreme Court · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by22 opinions
- Calloway v. City of RenoNevada Supreme Court · 2000
- Pope v. MOTEL 6Nevada Supreme Court · 2005
- United Nat'l Ins. Co. v. Frontier Ins. Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 2004
- Ringle v. BrutonNevada Supreme Court · 2004
- Public Employees' Benefits Program v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police DepartmentNevada Supreme Court · 2008
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.