Legal Opinion

City of Caldwell v. Roark

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1968No. 9915PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAYLOR, Justice.

Plaintiff (respondent) brought this action February 24, 1965, to acquire, by right of eminent domain, approximately 9.48 acres of land owned by defendants (appellants) Roy A. and Oleta Roark, and lying within the limits of the City of Caldwell, in Canyon County. The cause was tried to a jury on the issue of the value of the land taken. No severance damage was sought. Defendants brought this appeal from the judgment entered upon the verdict of the jury awarding them $12,500 compensation for the land taken. The land taken was part of a larger tract acquired by defendants in…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. CausbySupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Penn. Schuyl. V. R. v. ClearySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  3. Wassenich v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919
  4. People v. LoopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. State Highway Commission v. DealOregon Supreme Court · 1951

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Department of Highways v. SchulhoffSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
  2. City of Pocatello v. PetersonIdaho Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Ada County Highway District v. MagwireIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State Ex Rel. Symms v. City of Mountain HomeIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Tacchino v. State Department of HighwaysNevada Supreme Court · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API