Legal Opinion

Jonathan v. Nally

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided July 22, 2005No. 03-489PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReiber, J.

¶ 1. In State v. Sprague, 2003 VT 20, ¶ 1, 175 Vt. 123, 824 A.2d 539, we held as a matter of state constitutional law that law enforcement officers must have a reasonable basis to believe that their safety or the safety of others is at risk, or that a crime has been committed, before ordering the driver to exit a lawfully stopped vehicle. We further held that the officer in that case lacked a reasonable *224basis for the exit order; that the defendant had not voluntarily consented to leave his vehicle; and that the illegal seizure tainted the defendant’s later purported consent to a search of his…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Hunter v. BryantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Crawford-El v. BrittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Wilson v. LayneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Ohio v. RobinetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. LeBlanc v. LeBlancSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
  2. Crowell v. KirkpatrickDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2009
  3. Burwell v. PeytonDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2015
  4. Connelly v. City of St. Albans, VermontDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2024
  5. Forest v. HallVermont Superior Court · 2025

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API