Jonathan v. Nally
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtReiber, J.
¶ 1. In State v. Sprague, 2003 VT 20, ¶ 1, 175 Vt. 123, 824 A.2d 539, we held as a matter of state constitutional law that law enforcement officers must have a reasonable basis to believe that their safety or the safety of others is at risk, or that a crime has been committed, before ordering the driver to exit a lawfully stopped vehicle. We further held that the officer in that case lacked a reasonable *224basis for the exit order; that the defendant had not voluntarily consented to leave his vehicle; and that the illegal seizure tainted the defendant’s later purported consent to a search of his…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Hunter v. BryantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Crawford-El v. BrittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Wilson v. LayneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Ohio v. RobinetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- LeBlanc v. LeBlancSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
- Crowell v. KirkpatrickDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2009
- Burwell v. PeytonDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2015
- Connelly v. City of St. Albans, VermontDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2024
- Forest v. HallVermont Superior Court · 2025
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.