Legal Opinion

Singer v. Dong Sup Cha

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 18, 1988No. 01104PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MONTEMURO, Judge:

This is an appeal from the Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County dismissing the appellants’ complaint under the doctrine of lis pendens, or pendency of a prior action. We reverse.

On August 19, 1987, appellants, Jody L. Singer and Bruce Singer, husband and wife, commenced an action against the appellee, Dr. Dong Sup Cha, in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas. Jody Singer was under the professional care of the appellee for the cosmetic and surgical treatment of facial conditions. Appellants contended that the appellee had performed surgical procedures in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Thompson v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Procacina v. SusenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Radio Corp. of America v. RotmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Klein v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Smith v. LathropSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1863

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fernandez v. LevinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. First Commonwealth Bank v. HellerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. Norristown Auto. Co., Inc. v. HandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Davis Cookie Co., Inc. v. WasleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. v. MayerColorado Court of Appeals · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API