Legal Opinion
In Re Grievance Arbitration Between Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc. & City of Crosby
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 9, 1993No. CX-92-1405PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HARTEN, Judge.
Appellant Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc., the union representative of police officer Pamela L. Ulrich, challenges a district court order staying arbitration proceedings on a grievance of the termination of Ulrich’s probationary employment by respondent the City of Crosby. We affirm.
FACTS
The union entered into a collective bargaining agreement with the city, a public employer as defined in Minn.Stat. § 179A.03, subd. 15(c) (1990). In 1991, the city hired Ulrich as a police officer. Under the collective bargaining agreement, newly hired police officers have a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. BerthiaumeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Atcas v. Credit Clearing Corporation of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- Michael-Curry Companies v. Knutson Shareholders Liquidating TrustSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Minnesota Education Ass'n v. Independent School District No. 495Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Local No. 1119, American Federation State, County, & Municipal Employees v. Mesabi Regional Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ulrich v. City of CrosbyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1994