Legal Opinion

Carse v. State

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided February 9, 2010No. A09-985PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LARKIN, Judge.

Following his conviction of first-degree assault and the district court’s imposition of an aggravated sentence, appellant petitioned for postconviction relief, claiming that the district court erred by accepting his waiver of the right to be present at trial and that there was an insufficient factual basis to support his aggravated sentence. The district court denied appellant’s petition, and this appeal followed. Because the district court did not err by accepting appellant’s express waiver of his right to be present at trial, we affirm appellant’s conviction. But…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. State v. KindemSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  4. State v. HannukselaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  5. Leake v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. Ayala-LeyvaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
  2. State v. AhmedCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API