Tucker v. State
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SHUMAKER, Judge.
In this appeal from the district court’s denial of postconviction relief, appellant contends that the district court’s upward durational departure from the presumptive sentence was not supported by a proper aggravating factor and that appellant’s attorney rendered ineffective assistance in failing to contest the improper sentence. We affirm.
FACTS
At 2:25 a.m. on June 24, 2005, A.G. left a north Minneapolis bar with appellant Clemmie Tucker. A.G. drove her car and Tucker drove his truck as they engaged in, what Tucker agreed was, a “cat-and-mouse sort of chase.” When A.G.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. KindemSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State v. MisquadaceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Rairdon v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- State v. StummSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Tucker v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- State v. WeaverCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
- State v. RobideauCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- Tucker v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011