Legal Opinion

State v. Ostrem

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 18, 1995No. C0-94-56PublishedCited by 78 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GARDEBRING, Justice.

In December 1992, Jason Alan Ostrem was charged with second-degree burglary and theft. In October 1993, Ostrem was convicted of aiding and abetting second-degree burglary and aiding and abetting theft. See Minn.Stat. § 609.582, subd. 2(a) (1994); Minn.Stat. § 609.52, subd. 2(1) (1994); Minn. Stat. § 609.05 (1994). The court of appeals reversed Ostrem’s conviction on three grounds: 1) denial of due process resulting from a single-photo identification process; 2) impermissible appearance of partiality resulting from the trial court’s instruction on aiding and…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. State v. UlvinenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  5. State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by78 opinions

  1. Bernhardt v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  2. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  3. State v. RhodesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  4. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  5. State v. TscheuSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API