Bodick v. Harcliff Mining Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Hoffman, J.,
Plaintiff sued defendant in trespass. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiff. Defendant appealed to this court from orders of tbe lower court which refused its motions for judgment n.o.v. and for a new trial.
An appeal does not lie from the refusal of either a new trial or judgment n.o.v., but from the judgment entered subsequent to the court’s disposition of after-verdict motions. Simpson v. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, 884 Pa. 335, 121 A. 2d 84 (1956).
The record in the present appeal reveals that judgment had not been entered on the verdict when the appeal was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Simpson v. Pennsylvania Turnpike CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Denmon v. RhodesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Kersey Manufacturing Co. v. RozicSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
3Cited by6 opinions
- Davanzo v. FinelliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Crawford v. Manhattan Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Carl v. MatzkoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Marvin Vending Corp. v. BieberSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Bodick v. Harcliff Mining Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.