Sir Walter Lodge, No. 411 v. Swain
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
The question for decision is whether the ten-story office building situate at the southeast corner of Hargett and Salisbury Streets in the city of Raleigh and owned by the plaintiff is subject to an ad valorem assessment and taxation for the years 1934 to 1939. The record suggests an affirmative answer.
First. It is provided by the Revenue Act of 1933, ch. 204, sec. 304 (4-A), Public Laws 1933, that the following real property, and no other, shall be exempted from taxation: “Property belonging to or held for the benefit of . . . charitable ... or benevolent institutions or orders, where the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Leonard v. MaxwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Town of Benson v. County of JohnstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Southern Assembly v. . PalmerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Drainage Commissioners v. WebbSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- Congregation of United Brethren of Salem & Vicinity v. Commissioners of Forsyth CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Stanley v. Department of Conservation & DevelopmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- In Re the Appeal of MartinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Sale v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Harrison v. . Guilford CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Broadwell Realty Corp. v. CobleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.