Legal Opinion

Leonard v. Maxwell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 16, 1939PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

Tbe office of a demurrer is to test tbe sufficiency of a pleading, admitting, for tbe purpose, tbe truth of factual averments well stated and such relevant inferences as may be deduced therefrom, but it ■does not admit any legal inferences or conclusions of law asserted by tbe pleader. Pearce v. Privette, 213 N. C., 501, 196 S. E., 843; Kirby v. Reynolds, 212 N. C., 271, 193 S. E., 412; Ballinger v. Thomas, 195 N. C., 517, 142 S. E., 761; Manning v. R. R., 188 N. C., 648, 125 S. E., 555. We must, therefore, look to tbe allegations of tbe complaint to ascertain tbe questions presented.

First.…

2Cases cited66 opinions

  1. F. S. Royster Guano Co. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Steward MacHine Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Magoun v. Illinois Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  5. Bell's Gap Railroad v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Erickson v. StarlingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. Piedmont Canteen Service, Inc. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. Henderson v. . Gill, Comr. of RevenueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  4. Ramsey Ex Rel. Ramsey v. North Carolina Veterans CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  5. In re the Ordinance of Annexation No. 1977-4Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API