Legal Opinion

Marks v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 8, 2006No. 1863 C.D. 2005PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge SMITH-RIBNER.

Phillip Marks (Claimant) petitions the Court for review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) affirming an order of Workers’ Compensation Judge Donald H. Poorman that denied the review petition by Claimant and granted the termination petition by Dana Corporation (Employer). The questions include one of first impression: whether Employer has the same burden of disproving the causation of conditions that are similar to and involve the same body parts as those conditions accepted as compensa-ble under an agreement for compensation as Employer…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bethenergy Mines, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Udvari v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Jeanes Hospital v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Gumro v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Kurtz v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Waynesburg College)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Cinram Manufacturing, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Miller v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Ryndycz v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Kelley v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. C. Weston-Young v. WCAB (Central Bucks SD)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API