Legal Opinion

Ryndycz v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 18, 2007PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge SMITH-RIBNER.1

Richard Ryndycz (Petitioner) petitions for review of a decision by the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) that affirmed the December 7, 2005 decision of Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) Francis J. Desimone following a remand. The WCJ again affirmed a utilization review determination finding that chiropractic treatment rendered to Petitioner by Darryl K. Warner, D.C. was reasonable and necessary for forty-four treatments between July 31, 2002 and December 2, 2002 but was not reasonable and necessary for treatments after that. Petitioner questions whether…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Chik-Fil-A v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Cruz v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Trafalgar House & St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. Warminster Fiberglass v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Jorge)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. F. Hughes v. Wawa, Inc. (WCAB)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  2. F. Hughes v. Wawa, Inc. (WCAB)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  3. J.M. Rotegliano v. Clinton Hospital Corp. (WCAB)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
  4. Ryndycz v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API