Ryndycz v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge SMITH-RIBNER.1
Richard Ryndycz (Petitioner) petitions for review of a decision by the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) that affirmed the December 7, 2005 decision of Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) Francis J. Desimone following a remand. The WCJ again affirmed a utilization review determination finding that chiropractic treatment rendered to Petitioner by Darryl K. Warner, D.C. was reasonable and necessary for forty-four treatments between July 31, 2002 and December 2, 2002 but was not reasonable and necessary for treatments after that. Petitioner questions whether…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Chik-Fil-A v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Cruz v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Trafalgar House & St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Warminster Fiberglass v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Jorge)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- F. Hughes v. Wawa, Inc. (WCAB)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
- F. Hughes v. Wawa, Inc. (WCAB)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
- J.M. Rotegliano v. Clinton Hospital Corp. (WCAB)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
- Ryndycz v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007