Legal Opinion

United States v. Lamb

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 18, 1957No. Cr. 11800PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALBERT, District Judge.

Defendants are charged by a two count Indictment with:(1) knowingly, wilfully, and unlawfully stealing and converting to their own use personal property of the United States, to wit, “approximately 10,300 fir, cedar, and. hemlock logs of a value of more than $100” in violation of Title 18 U.S.C.A. § 641 j 1 and(2) knowingly, wilfully and unlawfully depredating certain real property of the United States within the jurisdiction of this Court in violation of Title 18 U.S. C.A. § 1361.1

Defendants have moved to dismiss Count I of the Indictment on the ground that it fails…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Hagner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Clifford F. MacEvoy Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Calvin Tomkins Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. United States v. DebrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. D. Ginsberg & Sons, Inc. v. PopkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Adams v. CulverSupreme Court of Florida · 1959
  2. Magnolia Motor & Logging Company, a Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
  3. Bangor-Hydro Electric Company v. JohnsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1967
  4. United States v. Donald Wayne HughesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  5. Ray v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1967

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API