Legal Opinion
Bangor-Hydro Electric Company v. Johnson
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided February 8, 1967PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARDEN, Justice.
On report.
Complainant (Bangor) is an electric light and power company engaged in selling electricity. In connection therewith it owns transmission lines consisting of wooden poles with wires attached, which poles are set into the ground within the limits of designated public highways and their locations in each instance authorized by written permits obtained from the public officials, authorized to act in that connection, in the municipalities in which the poles are located, under the provisions of 35 M.R.S.A. § 2482.
During the period September 1, 1962 to August 31, 1964…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Indian Motocycle Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Lane Construction Corp. v. Comptroller of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
- Inhabitants of Whiting v. Inhabitants of LubecSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1922
- City of Portland v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1907
- W. S. Libbey Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1953
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Searle v. Town of BucksportSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
- Boothbay Harbor Condominiums, Inc. v. Department of TransportationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- Enerquin Air, Inc. v. State Tax AssessorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
- Alabama Displays, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
- Harold MacQuinn, Inc. v. HalperinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.