Legal Opinion
Ray v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided May 2, 1967No. 4100PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MYERS, Associate Judge:
After trial by the court, appellant was found guilty of petit larceny of United States property in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 641. 1
Appellant was employed by a professional mover who was an independent contractor of the United States government. On the day of the alleged larceny, appellant’s duties were to transport and deliver several chairs and a typewriter from a storage area in the city to the warehouse area of the Department of Commerce. After part of his load had been transferred from the truck to the warehouse, appellant was seen carrying an adding machine cov-ered…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Groomes v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1959
- Stephen Robert Hughes v. United States of America, George P. Stack v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1964
- Tredwell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1920
- United States v. LambDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1957
3Cited by7 opinions
- Simmons v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Moss v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
- Lattimore v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- Durphy v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1967
- White v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.