Legal Opinion

Chesapeake Transit Co. v. Walker

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania

Decided January 20, 1908No. 34PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On Motion for New Trial.

1Opinion of the Court

J. B. McP'HERSON, District Judge.

This is an action brought against Abram C. Mott (who alone was served with process), the surety upon a bond conditioned for the faithful performance by Walker & Son, his principals, of a contract to build and equip a railroad. The principals having failed to carry out the contract, and the road having thereupon been built and equipped by another contractor at a higher price, the surety is now called upon by the company to make good the loss that is said to have been sustained. Two defenses were set up at the trial: First, that a provision in the contract…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Shelton v. American Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1904
  2. Zeigler v. HallahanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1904

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. 13.40 Acres of Land in City of RichmondDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1944
  2. Goehrig v. StrykerDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1909
  3. Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. Co. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  4. Chesapeake Transit Co. v. MottCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API