Legal Opinion
Zeigler v. Hallahan
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided June 13, 1904No. 25PublishedCited by 5 opinions
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
1Opinion of the Court
DALLAS, Circuit Judge.
The decision of the court below was based upon a case stated as follows:
“The plaintiff, Mary Helen Zeigler, on April 2, 1901, made, executed, and delivered to one Moses H. Lichten an indenture of lease for the premises *206known, and numbered as No. 50 North Eighth street, in the city of Philadelphia, of which indenture a copy is hereto attached, marked ‘Exhibit A,’ and made a part hereof, and the defendant, Peter T. I-lallahan, by writing, became surety for the fulfillment of all the obligations of said Moses H. Lichten under and by virtue of said indenture of lease; said…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Miller v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Guaranty Co. v. Pressed Brick Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Reese v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Cross v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Myron M. Navison Shoe Co. v. Lane Shoe Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1929
- Shelton v. American Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1904
- Pittsburg—Buffalo Co. v. American Fidelity Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1915
- Chesapeake Transit Co. v. WalkerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1908
- National Surety Co. v. New Mexico ex rel. Sandoval CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926