Legal Opinion

Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. Co. v. Davis

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 2, 1925No. 1227PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.

We take the following statement of the nature and result-of this suit from appellants’ brief; the contents of the exhibits referred to, as far as necessary to an understanding of .the issues being fully given.

“John Barton Payne (substituted by James C. Davis), Agent of United States government, herein styled plaintiff, filed this suit in the district court, Sixty-First judicial district of Texas, at Houston, September 15, 1920, against the defendants W. B. Drake and H. M. Bran-num, composing the firm of Drake-Brannum Construction Company, herein styled contractors, as principals, and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Thomas Lonergan v. San Antonio Trust Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Moore v. HanscomTexas Supreme Court · 1908
  4. United States v. FreelSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  5. Lane & Saylor v. Scott & CulverTexas Supreme Court · 1882

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Detroit Fidelity & Surety Co. v. PippinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  2. American Const. Co. v. LassigCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  3. American Const. Co. v. LassigCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  4. Knutson v. Metallic Slab Form Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API