Legal Opinion

Joseph v. Bostick

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided October 28, 1925No. 707-4267PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Statement.

NICKELS, J.

May —, 1919, Sam A. Joseph, owner of a certain lot, and John Bostick, Jr., real estate broker, executed a paper, wherein it was declared the owner gave the broker an “option” on the lot; the “option” to expire June 10, 1919, “unless availed of” by Bostick “or his assigns” by that time. The method of “availing of” the “option,” as provided, was this: “The parties” were then “to enter into a lease” contract for a term of . 99 years, and the lease contract was to have terms, conditions, etc., as follows:(a) Annual rental of $12,000, payable monthly.(b) Others thus described:

“…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Marble Co. v. RipleySupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  2. Cold Blast Transp. Co. v. Kansas City Bolt & Nut Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
  3. Hamburger & Dreyling v. ThomasTexas Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Weegham v. KilleferDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1914
  5. Bijur Motor Lighting Co. v. Eclipse Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Radford v. McNenyTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  2. National Security Life & Casualty Co. v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Muscle Shoals Aviation, Inc. v. Muscle Shoals Airport Auth.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  4. Crawford v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
  5. Tennant v. Buratti MontandonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API