Legal Opinion

Shellenberger v. Zeman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1956No. 33432PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinley, J.

Michael Shellenberger, age nine, through his guardian ad litem, commenced this action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained in a collision between a bicycle operated by the minor and an automobile driven by Mrs. Zeman. At the close of the plaintiff’s case, the defendants’ motion for an involuntary nonsuit and dismissal of the action was denied. Thereupon, defendants rested without presenting any evidence, and again challenged the sufficiency of the evidence to warrant a recovery in favor of the plaintiff. The trial court granted the motion and dismissed the jury. The trial court…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hein v. Chrysler Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Ruff v. Fruit Delivery Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Fries v. RitterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. Dunsmoor v. North Coast Transportation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Threatt Ex Rel. Threatt v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Blumenshein v. VoelkerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  2. Johnson v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Pacific Intermountain Express v. OlsonWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Beaty v. LinnWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Johnson v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API