Rumping v. Rumping
Montana Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Lewis and Clark County; J. Miller Smith, Judge. Action by Jo-bn H. Bumping against Eva Bumping. From-an order allowing defendant $50 suit money, and $150 to cover-the cost of the stenographer’s transcription of Ms notes, plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holloway
This cause was heretofore before this court on appeal by defendant from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff. (Rumping v. Rumping, 36 Mont. 39, 91 Pac. 1057, 12 L. R. A., n. s., 1197, 12 Ann. Cas. 1090.) The judgment was reversed, and thereafter the defect in the complaint, which was pointed out by this court, was cured- by amendment. The cause, having been brought to .issue and transferred to Lewis and Clark -county for trial, was tried, and a general verdict in plaintiff’s favor returned. The district court adopted the jury’s finding, made.*35some specific findings of fact, and rendered…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Merchants' National Bank v. GreenhoodMontana Supreme Court · 1895
- Rumping v. RumpingMontana Supreme Court · 1907
- Montana Ore Purchasing Co. v. Butte & Boston Consolidated Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1901
- White v. BarlingMontana Supreme Court · 1908
- Anaconda Copper Mining Co. v. HeinzeMontana Supreme Court · 1902
3Cited by6 opinions
- Moss v. GoodhartMontana Supreme Court · 1913
- State ex rel. Rankin v. MartinMontana Supreme Court · 1923
- State ex rel. Scott v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1920
- Kaufmann v. KaufmannSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Noyes Estate v. Granite-Alaska Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1922
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.