Legal Opinion
Gander v. Yeager
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided April 10, 2012No. 41066-4-IIPublishedCited by 69 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Worswick, A.C.J.
¶1 In this case involving neighbors locked in a boundary line dispute, Malcolm Gander and Melanie Keenan 1 appeal a trial court order denying their request for attorney fees. Karen Keefe and Elina Yeager cross appeal an order denying CR 11 sanctions. We affirm.
FACTS
¶2 Keefe and Yeager own adjoining lots on Bainbridge Island. Keefe and Yeager’s northern boundary lines adjoin Gander/Keenan’s property. In 2005, Keefe’s predecessors-in-interest, Dale and Mary Ridings, joined with Yeager in a suit to quiet title to a small strip of land along their boundary with Gander/Keenan. In…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Olympic Steamship Co., Inc. v. Centennial Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1991
- Ino Ino, Inc. v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Ino Ino, Inc. v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Rettkowski v. Department of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Sanders v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2010
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- Sources for Sustainable Communities v. Building Industry Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Hall v. FeigenbaumCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Microsoft Corp. v. Motorola, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2013
- Public Utility District No. 2 v. Comcast of Washington IV, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- In re the Marriage of Richard Todd Wixom & Linda Buchholz WixomCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.