Legal Opinion
Hall v. Feigenbaum
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided January 13, 2014No. Nos. 68727-1-I; 68927-4-IPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLeach, C.J.
¶1 In this commercial unlawful detainer action, Matthew Feigenbaum appeals multiple trial court orders, based primarily on allegations that Robert Hall failed to comply with the notice requirements of the parties’ lease and applicable statutes. Because Hall complied with these notice requirements and Feigenbaum does not otherwise show reversible error, we affirm and award Hall attorney fees incurred on appeal.
FACTS
¶2 In 2003, Matthew Feigenbaum entered into a commercial lease with Robert K. Hall to operate a nightclub (premises). The lease provided that Feigenbaum’s failure “to keep and…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Christensen v. EllsworthWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- Christensen v. EllsworthWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. CunninghamWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- Kadoranian v. Bellingham Police DepartmentWashington Supreme Court · 1992
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Randy Reynolds & Assocs., Inc. v. HarmonWashington Supreme Court · 2018
- Estate Of: Randall J. Langeland. Janell Boone, App. / X-res. v. Sharon Drown, Res. / X-app.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- Stephen Faciszewski Et Al., Respondents, v. Michael R. Brown Et Al., AppellantsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- Battle Ground Plaza, Llc, App./cross-res. v. Dean Maldonado, Et Ux, Res./cross-appsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Daniel Vargas v. City of AsotinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.