Legal Opinion

Corliss v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 27, 1925No. 6524, 6525PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMIDON, District Judge.

Defendants, Burt and Leroy Corliss, with numerous other persons, were indicted in fourteen counts for violation of section 215, and in the fifteenth count for violation of section 37 of the Penal Code (Comp. St. §§ 10385, 10201). These two defendants were convicted and sentenced to the penitentiary. They alone bring error.

The facts out of which tho case arose may be summarized as follows: Lel’oy Corliss had boon in the creamery business for over thirty years, and had conducted a business of that kind under his own management since 1902. The corporation which he first…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mobile & Ohio Railroad v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Wilson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1911
  3. Bettman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
  4. Feinberg v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
  5. Roberts v. . Roberts-Wicks Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1906

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Greenbaum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
  2. Connecticut Importing Co. v. Continental Distilling Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1940
  3. Foshay v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
  4. Stunz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
  5. Bronstein v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API