Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Stunz v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 2, 1928No. 8006PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SYMES, District Judge.

The defendants below, Harold M. Stunz, his wife, father, and two brothers, were jointly indicted and tried in the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Missouri, on 18 eounts for fraudulent use of the mails. Counts 6, 8, and 10 were nolled. Harold M. Stunz was convicted on all the remaining counts. The other defendants were acquitted.

The first 10 counts charge the defendants with having devised a scheme to defraud, and use of the mails in connection therewith, in selling a medical preparation known as “Korex”; counts 11 to 14, inclusive, allege…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. American School of Magnetic Healing v. McAnnultySupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. AMERICAN SCHOOL OF MAGNETIC HEALING v. McANNULTYSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  3. Harrison v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1912
  4. Hendrey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1916
  5. Tucker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Baker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
  2. Marson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
  3. Martin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
  4. Hard & Rand, Inc. v. Biston Coffee Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
  5. Beck v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API