Legal Opinion

Mooney v. Van Kleeck Mortgage Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 29, 1926No. 11,292PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sheafor

Defendant in error was plaintiff in the lower court, the plaintiff in error was defendant there, and the parties will be so designated here.

Plaintiff recovered judgment in the first trial of this case, in the trial court for $1,875, loss of profits for breach of contract in failing to accept a loan. Defendant brought the case to this court, where the judgment of the trial court was reversed, and the case remanded with instructions to grant a new trial on the sole question of the amount of damages. Mooney v. Van Kleeck Mortgage Co., 75 Colo. 173, 225 Pac. 210.

In that case this court affirmed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. Triunfo Gold & Silver Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1870
  2. White v. AbbottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  3. Matthews & Willard Manuf'g Co. v. Trenton Lamp Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1896
  4. Mooney v. Van Kleeck Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1924

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Good v. AB Chance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Phelps v. Woodward Con. Co., N. Util.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Daly v. LiningerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1930
  4. Fitzgerald v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  5. Allison v. Bank One - DenverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API