Legal Opinion

Matthews & Willard Manuf'g Co. v. Trenton Lamp Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey

Decided March 24, 1896PublishedCited by 5 opinions

These were four suits in equity by the Matthews & Willard Manufacturing Company against the Trenton Lamp Company and others for alleged infringement of certain design patents for lamps.

1Opinion of the Court

GREEN, District Judge.

There are pending four suits between the parties complainant and defendant, which relate to, and charge the infringement of, certain patented designs for lamps, or parts of *213lamps. Upon the argument they were treated as one controversy, and properly so; for. while the several distinct designs are for specific and separate parts of a lamp, it is perfectly feasible to arrange in any one lamp at least two of the designs (if not more), and tiie sale of a single lamp, so prepared, may in volved the infringement of the designs in question. The letters patent involved in this…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sparkman v. HigginsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1846
  2. Streat v. WhiteU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1888

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State, Ex Rel. Landis v. De Witt C. Jones Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1933
  2. National Can Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1981
  3. In re the Estate of HookerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1940
  4. Mooney v. Van Kleeck Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1926
  5. West Hazleton Borough Auditors' Report, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API