Legal Opinion

Kean v. Bailey

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided January 28, 1949No. 162PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

NORDBYE, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff has succeeded to the title of a large tract of land in northern Minnesota commonly known as the “Joyce Estate.” On May 11, 1925, on a petition of plaintiff’s father alleging diversity of citizenship between him and the named defendants, this Court enjoined “Dick Bailey and E. óon-solin, and each of them, * * * and all other persons whomsoever, from and after the time they severally receive notice or knowledge of this decree and issuance of the injunction pursuant thereto” from hunting or going upon the land comprising this estate or aiding others to do so or…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Grannis v. OrdeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Hitchman Coal & Coke Co. v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Regal Knitwear Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Howat v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1922

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. STATE EX REL. LaMERE v. YoungSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API