Gilbert v. Sleeper
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Lake County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Belcher, C. C.
This is an action to recover possession of 17.67 acres of land. The defendant answered, and by way of cross-complaint set up an equitable defense. The plaintiff demurred, and then answered to the cross-complaint. After trial, judgment waá entered in favor of the defendant, from which, and from an order denying a new trial, plaintiff appealed.
The demurrer to the cross-complaint was properly overruled. If the facts were as alleged, the plaintiff held the legal title to the land in controversy in trust for the defendant, and he was entitled to the relief demanded.
It appears from…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Love v. WatkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Bigelow v. ArmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Beebe v. DowdNew York Supreme Court · 1856
3Cited by19 opinions
- Berniker v. BernikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Smith v. BanghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Child v. ChildUtah Supreme Court · 1958
- Miller v. DyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Estate of ReidCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.