Kaynor v. Farline
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtKurtz, J.
Corissa and Christopher Kaynor were injured when a vehicle driven by 17-year-old Nicholas Farline *578struck their vehicle. Later, Mr. Kaynor died of his injuries. Based on the family car doctrine, Ms. Kaynor filed a claim for wrongful death and personal injury against Nicholas’s divorced parents, Bruce Farline and Karen Dahl-Green. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Nicholas’s parents, concluding that the family car doctrine did not apply because (1) there was no evidence that Ms. Dahl-Green owned, maintained, or provided the vehicle driven by Nicholas, (2) Nicholas resided…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Young v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
- Birch v. AbercrombieWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Kahn v. SalernoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
- Hulse v. DriverCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Starr v. HillTennessee Supreme Court · 2011
- Young v. BeckArizona Supreme Court · 2011
- Watson v. EmardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011