Legal Opinion

Kaynor v. Farline

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 10, 2003No. 21199-1-IIIPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKurtz, J.

Corissa and Christopher Kaynor were injured when a vehicle driven by 17-year-old Nicholas Farline *578struck their vehicle. Later, Mr. Kaynor died of his injuries. Based on the family car doctrine, Ms. Kaynor filed a claim for wrongful death and personal injury against Nicholas’s divorced parents, Bruce Farline and Karen Dahl-Green. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Nicholas’s parents, concluding that the family car doctrine did not apply because (1) there was no evidence that Ms. Dahl-Green owned, maintained, or provided the vehicle driven by Nicholas, (2) Nicholas resided…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Young v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Birch v. AbercrombieWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Kahn v. SalernoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
  5. Hulse v. DriverCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Starr v. HillTennessee Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Young v. BeckArizona Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Watson v. EmardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API