Legal Opinion
Kahn v. Salerno
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided February 17, 1998No. 39180-1-IPublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKennedy, J.
Tina Kahn appeals the trial court’s order granting summary judgment to Charles Salerno and Kristen Salerno, husband and wife, and Armand Lee Hoch and Melody Hoch, husband and wife, contending that genuine issues of material fact exist with respect to her hostile work environment, retaliatory termination, and fraud claims. We agree and reverse.
FACTS
From September 1991 until her discharge in March 1994, Appellant Tina Kahn worked part-time on a flexible work schedule at Salerno Agency, a life insurance agency owned by Respondents Charles Salerno (Salerno) and Kristen Salerno. During that time,…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement v. Dillingham Construction, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- District of Columbia v. Greater Washington Board of TradeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Ellis v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- > FRATERNAL ORDER OF EAGLES, TENINO AERIE NO. 564 v. Grand Aerie of Fraternal Order of EaglesWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Francom v. Costco Wholesale Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- Renz v. Spokane Eye ClinicCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- Estevez v. Faculty Club of the University of WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.