State v. Horn
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The defendants, Horn and Ortiz, were indicted and convicted by a jury of the crime of escape in the second degree (HRS § 710-1021). They appeal from the judgment and sentence of the circuit court.
We are called upon to decide whether and to what extent the “choice of evils” or “necessity” defense (HRS § 703-302) is available to the accused in escape situations. We hold that the defense is available to the escapee provided certain conditions are met, and in this regard we adopt the rationale and the conditions imposed by People v. Lovercamp, 43 Cal.App.3d 823, 118 Cal.Rptr. 110 (1974), with one…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- People v. LovercampCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Parissi v. Telechron, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- State v. MarleyHawaii Supreme Court · 1973
- United States v. Richard T. Gosser, United States of America v. Donald J. Pinciotti, United States of America v. Ted MaisonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- State v. MooreHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. PachecoHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. DianaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
- State v. RosadoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Wells v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1984
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.