Kutch v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scott
In order to resolve this arbitration dispute, we must decide whether the petitioner, Kay Kutch, is precluded from enforcing an arbiJ tration award in excess of her insurance policy limits despite the failure of the respondent, State Farm Automobile Insurance Company, to seek review of the award within the time allotted by statute.1 We hold that *95because State Farm’s contract defense was time barred, Kutch may enforce, the full award. We therefore reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and remand with directions to reinstate the district court’s order confirming the arbitration award.
I..
Th…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union No. 969 v. Babcock & Wilcox, D/B/A B & W Construction Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Judd Construction Co. v. Evans Joint VentureSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- Boyce v. St. Paul Property & Liability InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Cabs, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- Meade v. LUMBERMENS MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANYSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Applehans v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
- Coors Brewing Co. v. CaboColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
- Stewart Title Guaranty Co. v. TildenWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
- Shultz v. Atlantic Mutual InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
- Levy v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2011
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.