Legal Opinion

Meade v. LUMBERMENS MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided December 9, 1982No. 61418PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

423 So.2d 908 (1982)

Terry MEADE, Petitioner,

v.

LUMBERMENS MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY, Respondent.

No. 61418.

Supreme Court of Florida.

December 9, 1982.

Seymour H. Rowland, Jr., and Victor J. Musleh of Musleh, Piccin, Atkins & Krehl, Ocala, for petitioner.

Leslie King O'Neal of Markel, Scott, McDonough & O'Neal, Orlando, for respondent.

OVERTON, Justice.

The petitioner, Terry Meade, seeks review of the decision of the Fifth District Court of Appeal reported as Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. Meade, 404 So.2d 1141 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981), which we find expressly conflicts with Travelers Insurance Co. v.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Travelers Ins. Co. v. AllenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  2. Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co. v. MeadeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Paradise Plaza Condominium Ass'n v. Reinsurance Corp. of New YorkDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  2. United Services Auto. Ass'n v. SmithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  3. Kutch v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  4. Harris v. Allied American InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  5. Shultz v. Atlantic Mutual InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API