Legal Opinion
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Cabs, Inc.
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided February 22, 1988No. 86SA124PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROVIRA, Justice.
Cabs, Inc., d/b/a Zone Cab Company (Zone), appeals an order of the district court confirming an arbitration award entered against it, claiming that the statute authorizing the arbitration is unconstitutional. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm) cross-appeals, alleging that the district court erred in allowing Zone to present substantive defenses to confirmation of the arbitration award. Although under the Uniform Arbitration Act (U.A.A. or Act), §§ 13-22-201 to -223, 6A C.R.S. (1987), Zone’s objections regarding the authority of the arbitrators to…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Trustees of Boston & Maine Corp. v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
- Judd Construction Co. v. Evans Joint VentureSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- Columbine Valley Construction Co. v. Board of DirectorsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- Schroud v. Van C. Argiris & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
- City of Westminster v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. BroadnaxSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- United Technology & Resources, Inc. v. Dar Al IslamNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
- Farmers Insurance Exchange v. TaylorColorado Court of Appeals · 2001
- Barrett v. Investment Management Consultants, Ltd.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2008
- Knass v. Blue Cross of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.