Legal Opinion

Cruff v. A.R.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 2010No. 20090197PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARING, Justice.

[¶ 1] A.R. appeals a juvenile court’s order adjudicating him a delinquent child for committing disorderly conduct. A.R. argues the juvenile court erred in denying his motion to dismiss and finding sufficient evidence exists to sustain a conviction because his speech is protected by the First Amendment. Because A.R.’s speech is not protected by the First Amendment and the petition sufficiently alleged facts to place A.R. on notice, we hold the juvenile court did not err in denying the motion to dismiss and finding sufficient evidence exists to adjudicate him a delinquent child.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Cohen v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Gitlow v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. City of Bismarck v. NassifNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  5. City of Bismarck v. SchoppertNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. KleppeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. R.A.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State v. BrossartNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  4. City of Fargo v. RoehrichNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Interest of D.O.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2013

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API